[guardian-dev] Fwd: Conceal: efficient storage encryption for Android
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at guardianproject.info
Tue Oct 21 14:54:39 EDT 2014
I am pretty sure we considered Conceal around the time of the v0.1 IOCipher
release. If I remember correctly, it encrypts, per-file, so it leaks a lot of
metadata.
As for a minimal openssl build, that would be quite nice to have. That seems
to be the kind of thing that you need lots of money to spend on a build
engineer in order to achieve.
.hc
Nathan of Guardian wrote:
>
> Seems like we might learn some things about minimizing OpenSSL from the
> project below. Also, just another interesting tool.
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: Richard Newman <rnewman at mozilla.com>
> To: "mobile-firefox-dev" <mobile-firefox-dev at mozilla.org>
> Subject: Conceal: efficient storage encryption for Android
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:19:47 -0700
>
> Came across this today.
>
> https://code.facebook.com/posts/1419122541659395/introducing-conceal-efficient-storage-encryption-for-android/
>
> http://facebook.github.io/conceal/
>
> I find it interesting that — as we almost did at one point — they’ve
> chopped down OpenSSL to 85KB, wrapped it in Java, and ended up with an
> efficient storage interface for encrypted data.
>
> This might finally put us in a place where we’re OK keeping profiles on
> an SD card. We might also consider using this for secure backup/restore
> of profile data.
>
> BSD licensed.
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-firefox-dev mailing list
> mobile-firefox-dev at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
>
>
--
PGP fingerprint: 5E61 C878 0F86 295C E17D 8677 9F0F E587 374B BE81
More information about the Guardian-dev
mailing list